The Complete Guide to Understanding Carbon Offset Market

The Complete Guide to Understanding Carbon Offset Market

Introduction to Carbon Credits, Offsets, and Markets

Both the 1997 Kyoto Protocol and the 2015 Paris Agreement were international agreements that set global CO2 emission targets. The latter has resulted in national emissions targets and the laws to support them, with all but six nations approving them.

With these new requirements in place, businesses are under more pressure than ever to find ways to lower their carbon footprint. The majority of the temporary fixes in use today use carbon markets. By assigning a price to CO2 emissions, the carbon markets turn them into a commodity.

These emissions can be bought and sold on a carbon market as either carbon credits or carbon offsets, and they both fall into one of these two categories. It’s a straightforward concept that offers a market-based answer to a challenging issue.

Carbon Credits and Carbon Offsets

Although the phrases are sometimes used interchangeably, carbon credits and offsets have different workings. Carbon credits commonly referred to as carbon allowances, act as authorization slips for emissions. A corporation can produce one tonne of CO2 emissions if it purchases a carbon credit, generally from the government. With carbon credits, revenue from carbon is transferred vertically from businesses to regulators, while businesses that wind up with extra credits can sell them to other businesses.

Horizontal offset flows are used to exchange carbon revenue across businesses. For instance, if an organisation as part of removing one unit of carbon from the atmosphere routine business activities, it can generate a carbon offset. Then, other businesses can buy the carbon offset to lower their carbon footprints. It should be noted that the two terms can occasionally be used synonymously and that carbon offsets are frequently referred to as “offset credits.” Nevertheless, it’s important to remember the difference between voluntary offsets and regulatory compliance credits.

Creation of Carbon Credits and Offsets

Although the fundamental trading unit is the same—the equivalent of one tonne of carbon emissions, commonly known as CO2e—credits and offsets represent two slightly distinct markets. First, it’s important to remember that a tonne of CO2 does refer to a precise weight measurement. How much CO2 is contained in a tonne. For example, The typical American produces 16 tonnes of CO2e annually from driving, shopping, using gas and electricity at home, and other activities related to daily living.

California has its own carbon market in the United States and grants residents credits for their gas and electricity usage. Typically, annual credit issuance is determined by emissions targets. Credits are frequently distributed through a mechanism known as a ‘cap-and-trade.’ Regulators established a cap for carbon emissions. It gets harder and harder for firms to keep inside that cap as it gradually declines over time.

Several nations and states are considering implementing cap-and-trade regimes, including Canada, the EU, UK, China, New Zealand, Japan, and South Korea. As a result, businesses are encouraged to cut back on the emissions they emit to stay under their limits. A cap-and-trade programme adds market incentives to cut carbon emissions more quickly while easing the burden on businesses striving to fulfil short-term emissions limits.

However, carbon offsets function a little bit differently. Companies can choose to provide carbon offsets if they engage in activities that reduce the amount of carbon that is already present in the environment, including boosting tree planting or using renewable energy sources. Carbon offsets make up what is known as the “Voluntary Carbon Market” because purchasing these offsets is voluntary. Companies can, however, significantly reduce their CO2 emissions by purchasing these carbon offsets.

Carbon Marketplace

Two prominent, distinct markets are available to purchase carbon credits within the carbon market.

  • One is a market governed by ‘cap-and-trade’ laws at the state and regional levels, and it is usually regulated.
  • The second is a voluntary market where companies and people can purchase credits to offset their carbon emissions.

While the voluntary market is optional, the regulated market is mandated. Regarding the regulated market, every business participating in a cap-and-trade scheme receives a specific quantity of carbon credits per year. Some of these businesses generate fewer emissions than the carbon credits granted, leaving them with excess credits.

Most key organisations globally are either taking action or preparing a plan to reduce their carbon footprint. However, more than the number of carbon credits allotted to them each year (determined by the size of each organisation and the effectiveness of their operations against industry benchmarks) may be required to meet their demands.

Despite technological advancements, some businesses have a long way to go before significantly decreasing their emissions. However, they must continue offering goods and services to make money required to reduce their operations’ carbon impact. As a result, they must figure out means to reduce the amount of carbon they are already emitting.

Here’s an example:

Let’s assume that the combined carbon emissions of two businesses, Company 1 and Company 2, are limited to 300 tonnes.

While Company 2 will only emit 200 tonnes of carbon this year, Company 1 is on ways to emit 400 tonnes.

Company 1 can purchase credits from Company 2, which has extra emissions space available because they produced 100 tonnes less carbon this year than they were permitted to, to make up for the 100 excess tonnes of CO2e they emitted to avoid a penalty made up of fines and additional fees.

Voluntary and Compliance Markets: Difference

The voluntary market operates somewhat differently. Businesses in this industry can collaborate with organisations and people who value the environment and offset their carbon emissions voluntarily. There is nothing required here.

It might be a business that cares about the environment and wants to show that they contribute to environmental protection. Or it can be someone who cares about the environment and wants to reduce the carbon they emit when they travel.

For instance, the oil major Shell declared in 2021 that it planned to offset 120 million tonnes of carbon by 2030. Whatever their motivation, businesses seek ways to become involved, and the voluntary carbon market gives them that opportunity.

The voluntary and regulatory markets work best together in the professional (and personal) sphere. Additionally, they increase the number of buyers available to farmers, ranchers, and landowners, whose businesses frequently produce carbon offsets for sale.

Overall size of carbon offset markets

Measurement of the voluntary carbon market is challenging. Since the value of carbon credits is highly correlated with how well the issuing company is regarded, the price of carbon credits varies, especially for carbon offsets. In addition, there are typical differences between the various forms of carbon offsets. Still, third-party validators give additional control to the process by ensuring that each carbon offset indeed results from genuine emissions reductions.

According to projections, the voluntary carbon market will be worth between $10 and $25 billion by 2030, depending on how strongly nations around the world pursue climate change commitments. Last year, it was predicted to be worth about $400 million.

Analysts concur that the voluntary carbon market’s involvement is expanding quickly despite the challenges. The voluntary carbon market would still need to catch up for the world to fully achieve the goals established in the Paris Agreement, even at the predicted rate of expansion.

How to produce carbon credits

By lowering, absorbing, and storing emissions via various procedures, a wide range of business types is able to produce and market carbon credits.

Following are some of the popular forms of carbon offsetting projects:

  • Projects using renewable energy,
  • Enhancing energy effectiveness,
  • Capturing and storing carbon and methane
  • Land use and reforestation.

Long before carbon credit markets became popular, renewable energy projects already existed. The globe is fortunate to have many renewable energy resources in nature. Nations like Brazil or Canada, which have a lot of lakes and rivers, or countries like Denmark and Germany, which have a lot of windy areas. Renewable energy was already a desirable and affordable form of electricity generation for these nations, and now they also provide the bonus of producing carbon offsets.

Energy efficiency improvements complement renewable energy projects by reducing the energy requirements of existing structures and infrastructure. By consuming less energy, even negligible, everyday adjustments like switching your household’s incandescent lights to LED ones can help the environment. On a broader scale, this can entail things like remodelling buildings, streamlining industrial operations to increase efficiency, or providing the less fortunate with more efficient equipment.

Implementing procedures to remove CO2 and methane from the atmosphere (over 20 times more detrimental to the environment than CO2) is known as carbon and methane capture. Methane is easier to manage since it can be quickly burned off to produce CO2. Despite the fact that methane is nearly 20 times more harmful to the atmosphere than carbon dioxide, the conversion of one methane molecule to one carbon dioxide molecule by combustion reduces net emissions by more than 95%.

Direct carbon capture frequently occurs at the source, such as from chemical or power facilities. The idea of keeping this carbon for a long time and treating it similarly to nuclear waste is a more recent thought, even though the injection of this collected carbon underground has been employed for many purposes, such as increased oil recovery, for decades. Trees and soil serve as Mother Nature’s carbon sinks, absorbing carbon from the atmosphere through land use and reforestation programmes. This includes managing soil, growing new forests, and preserving and repairing old forests.

Photosynthesis is a process through which plants turn atmospheric CO2 into organic matter, which finally becomes dead plant matter and is buried in the earth. After it has been absorbed, the CO2-enriched soil helps restore the soil’s natural properties, increasing agricultural yield and lowering pollution.

Verification of carbon credits

Technically speaking, carbon credits are carbon permits given by the government. They can be purchased and traded on various exchanges under the appropriate circumstances. However, membership is restricted to organisations (usually businesses) in regions with an Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). Only California has a state-run carbon trading programme in the US. With no official market to supply this demand, there is nevertheless a rising demand for businesses to be accountable for their greenhouse gas emissions. The concept of carbon offsets is used in this situation.

Carbon offsets are carbon credits that are exchanged on a voluntary market. Companies can “offset” the carbon they produce by investing in programmes that reduce carbon emissions. Offsets are not subject to any current laws or regulations. Instead, they represent a completely normal market reaction to a new demand.

Who verifies carbon credits – An important question 

The market is left to manage its verification processes without a government regulator. This creates a lot of uncertainty in a still-developing market, but it also presents a massive opportunity for any organisation that can manage other carbon offset suppliers.

Verification, however, involves more than just adhering to legal obligations. Verification makes sure that customers get the most for their money. In the open market, verification is frequently the responsibility of a third party. The voluntary carbon market is hardly an exception, as that third party frequently exerts disproportionate influence over the evolution of the larger market.

Multiple market approaches

When a carbon offset is required, acquiring them has two possibilities.

· Individuals who wish to purchase carbon offsets may choose the offsets they want and set their own price. Websites like Nori and GoldStandard essentially let the consumer in charge of the verification process. The customer reviews the initiatives and chooses the ones he believes will have the most significant impact.

· These sites for the voluntary offset market conduct some verification on their own. Nori and GoldStandard implicitly verify the programmes when they decide whether to sell them on the website.

In a portfolio, other offset markets offer offsets. For example, companies like Native can sell a variety of offsets in one bundle by grouping offsets from various projects together. Diversification is a verification form because only some projects will be as effective as others in lowering CO2 emissions. However, investors can be sure that firmer offsets will cancel out weaker ones by acquiring offsets that cover multiple projects.

Building a new verification ecosystem

There are a few very relevant and essential questions relating to carbon trading, both carbon offsets and carbon credits:

  1. What goes into a carbon offset
  2. Who determines the amount of carbon sequestered in a particular programme
  3. Who measures the carbon emissions reductions

The astute provider of carbon offsets is aware that the market for offsets is an excellent chance for them to position themselves as the best verification instrument. Any business promoting itself as having the finest verification method can take the lead in the quickly expanding offset market for years to come.

The results speak for themselves. A victory will go to the business that can demonstrate how their carbon offsets benefited sustainable development. Anyone who can show that GHG emission reductions were accomplished will be able to leverage that achievement to draw in more investors for their initiatives. A higher level of verification produces results that can be seen in the voluntary carbon market. Additionally, measurable outcomes will boost carbon offset sales in a world where environmental damage is becoming more widely recognised.

Example of a company attempting to do just that is Verra.

Verra positions itself as a corporation that offers trustworthy carbon standards rather than as a vendor of carbon offsets. Verra and its rivals’ initiatives to offer internal offset verification services set them apart.

For Verra, this entails finding, educating, and upholding a network of auditors who can monitor offset initiatives, given the company’s approval. In addition, internal offset project verification is being done to ensure that a tonne of carbon offset is indeed a tonne of carbon removed. That demands a vast network and is more difficult to state than done. However, the potential reward is worthwhile, given how quickly the expanding carbon offset market.

Verra and others are advocating for the opportunity to serve as the de facto verification organisation for a whole industry. The market may appear to be in opposition to that push, but as always, consumers will have the final say. It could take some time to notice the differences between carbon offset projects, but as the market expands, selecting offsets based on reputation will become simpler. It’s not necessary for the government to establish a standard for carbon offsets. The markets have the power and will exercise that power.

A new market with enormous potential will be created by combining mandatory carbon credits with voluntary carbon offsets. However, not everyone will be able to profit from the new marketplaces.

Ironically, many of the companies who lost out on carbon credits are ones that ought to seem like they would be ideal candidates for any eco-friendly effort. These ostensibly clear carbon winners, unfortunately, are losers.

Oil and Natural Gas Companies

The media frequently highlights the ongoing, enormous demand for oil before panicking that the world economy would never wean itself off fossil fuels. The truth is that oil and natural gas are already dying a thousand deaths, and carbon credits are one of them.

Carbon credits are a means for customers to directly reward renewable energy companies on the voluntary market. Consider them as a form of free-market subsidy that gives green energy providers a source of additional revenue. Companies that use fossil fuels will face competition from rapidly expanding, highly profitable green energy firms. And the problem extends beyond carbon credits alone. Under pressure from the market and the government, automakers are producing more electric vehicles and fewer automobiles with internal combustion engines. Sale of new internal combustion engine vehicles could be prohibited by governments like the EU and the UK as early as 2030, compelling businesses to switch to electric vehicles.

The use of electric vehicles is only the beginning. Boats may now use the same technology similar to electric cars. The demand for fossil fuels will gradually but steadily decline as that technology is scaled up. Carbon credits will also be used to fund green energy programmes and projects that reduce emissions throughout the entire process. The carbon credit bonanza will mostly benefit non-fossil fuel businesses.

Transparency

For both investors and companies, carbon credits are a brand-new market. Particularly open is the market for voluntary carbon offsets. Nearly any environmentally good project can currently start to appear to be a reliable offset. All carbon offsets, however, are not created equal. Entities acquiring carbon offsets depend on the credibility of the third-party vendor because there is no external regulator to compare the impact of one project against another.

Less openness exists in these early stages of the carbon offset markets, making it harder to distinguish between good and bad projects. Transparency will increase as organisations create better metrics to monitor the efficiency of carbon offsets. Transparency, however, loses out on carbon credits in the short term while markets are still adjusting. For investors, every emerging economy offers fresh opportunities.

Summary

Carbon Credit : Definition

the authorization to release a single tonne of carbon dioxide or an equivalent quantity of another greenhouse gasis granted by a marketable permit or certificate known as a carbon credit.In essence, a carbon credit serves as a financial offset for the companies that produce greenhouse gases. The main goal of creating carbon credits is to lower industrial activity’s emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases in order to lessen the effects of global warming. 

Carbon credits are market-based strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Governments or regulatory organisations enforce the caps on greenhouse gas emissions. Some businesses may not be able to afford the rapid reduction in emissions. As a result, they can purchase carbon credits to reach the emission limit.

Companies that successfully achieve carbon offsets (lowering greenhouse gas emissions) are typically rewarded with additional carbon credits. Future projects for the reduction of emissions may be subsidised by the sale of credit surpluses. The Kyoto Protocol approved the introduction of such credits. The Paris Agreement establishes the rules for further facilitating the markets for carbon credits and verifies the use of carbon credits.

Types of Carbon Credits

There are two types of credits:

  • Voluntary emissions reduction (VER): A carbon offset that is traded for credits on an unregulated or voluntary market.
  • Certified emissions reduction (CER): Emission units (or credits) made possible by a legal framework with the intention of balancing the emissions of a project.

The primary distinction between the two is that, as opposed to the VER, the CER is governed by an independent certifying authority.

Trading Credits

Both governmental and private markets are available for trading carbon credits. International credit transfers are permitted under current commercial regulations. The levels of supply and demand on the markets essentially determine how much credit is priced. The prices of the credits change as a result of regional variations in supply and demand. Despite the fact that carbon credits are good for society, it might be difficult for the typical investor to begin using them as investment vehicles.

The sole product that may be used to purchase credits is certified emissions reductions (CERs). However, certain carbon funds created by major financial institutions sell CERs. Small investors have the chance to enter the market through the carbon funds. The trading of the credits is conducted on specific platforms, such as the European Energy Exchange, NASDAQ OMX Commodities Europe, and the European Climate Exchange.

Carbon Credits vs. Carbon Offsets

Both carbon offsets and credits are basically accounting techniques. They give us a method to balance the pollution scales. Since CO2 is the same gas everywhere in the world, the main tenet of credits and offsets is that it doesn’t matter where emissions are reduced. It makes economical sense for both consumers and businesses to cut emissions where it is cheapest and easiest to do so, even if that does not touch their own operations.

Even though the phrases “Carbon Credits” and “Carbon Offsets” are frequently used interchangeably, they relate to two separate products with two different functions. It’s crucial to comprehend how the two differ and which one will enable to achieve one’s goals before one can start buying either. The terms are defined broadly as follows:

· Carbon Offset: A removal of GHGs from the atmosphere.

· Carbon credit: A reduction in GHGs released into the atmosphere.

A Carbon Offset and Carbon Credit Primer

Let’s examine each of these products in more detail individually. The process of “carbon sequestration” is what is involved in producing a carbon offset. Remember that a judge has the authority to order the sequestration of a jury, which entails isolating them from the public. The process for carbon offsets is the same: CO2 emissions are taken out of the atmosphere and stored for a while.

This can be accomplished in different ways, including the holy grail of carbon sequestration: using cutting-edge technology to convert CO2 emissions into a useful product. Other methods include planting forests, blasting rock into tiny pieces, storing carbon in manufactured goods, capturing methane gas at landfills, and planting trees. Independent businesses that remove CO2 emissions from the atmosphere create carbon offsets. The corporations that emit (or have emit) CO2 are then purchased the offsets. In a sense, the businesses that produce GHGs pay the offset-producing businesses directly. On the other hand, carbon credits are typically “produced” by the government.

Governments set a ceiling on the quantity of GHGs that businesses are permitted to release, i.e., the maximum number of tonnes of CO2 that a corporation is permitted to emit. Carbon credits are used to describe each of those tonnes.

Businesses meet this cap by lowering the emissions generated during operations by increasing energy efficiency or converting to renewable energy sources. A company that reduces its overall emissions below the legal limit may sell the extra credits to companies that are unable or unwilling to reduce their own emissions to meet legal requirements.

The Two Carbon Markets

An another significant difference exists between carbon credits and carbon offsets:

  • The carbon compliance market is where carbon credits are often traded.
  • The voluntary carbon market is where carbon offset transactions often take place.

A fragmented carbon compliance market is emerging as a result of the proliferation of mandatory GHG emission reduction programmes. For instance, the EU’s Emissions Trading System (ETS) allows businesses to purchase carbon credits from other businesses. While nine states along the east coast have established their own cap-and-trade conglomerate, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, California runs its own cap-and-trade scheme.

Although the market for voluntary carbon is currently considerably smaller than the market for compliance, it is predicted to grow significantly over the next few years.It is accessible to anyone who wants to lessen or completely erase their carbon footprint but is not legally obligated to do so, including people, businesses, and other organisations. Customers can buy carbon offsets to compensate for emissions from a single high-emission activity, such a lengthy travel, or they can buy them repeatedly to reduce their overall carbon footprint.

What does one need – Carbon Offsets or Carbon Credits

The answer is probably ‘both’ if it’s a corporation, but it all relies on the corporate objectives. Carbon credits are probably not available to consumers, but one can still help by buying carbon offsets. 

Referring back to the preceding example, our crucial, global objective is to stop dumping chemicals into the all-purpose water supply and to gradually detoxify the current water supply. To put it in a different way, if we want to significantly reduce pollution, we must act to both reduce CO2 emissions and remove the CO2 that is already in the atmosphere.

Government regulations on GHG emissions are strict, so businesses will need to change how they operate to cut emissions as much as they can. Those that cannot be eliminated will require the purchase of carbon credits to be taken into consideration. Ambitious businesses, individuals, and organisations can buy carbon offsets to make up for past emissions or to get to net zero.

Leave a comment